Pediatrics Research - Child Development, Perinatal Medicine, Child Health Care

Pediatrics Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Pediatrics, including details on child development, perinatal medicine, child health care.


Pediatrics Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Pediatrics

Books on Pediatrics

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Ambiguous abbreviations: an audit of abbreviations in paediatric note keeping.

Sheppard JE, Weidner LC, Zakai S, Fountain-Polley S, Williams J

Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, UK.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency, nature and understanding of abbreviations in medical records. DESIGN: Audit of abbreviation use and meaning in paediatric handover sheets and medical notes compared to two standards, the Trust Intranet Medical Dictionary (TID) and Mosby's Medical Dictionary (MMD). A selection of abbreviations was shown to healthcare professionals to examine interpretation of abbreviations. SETTING: Large inner-city district general hospital, Birmingham, UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency, nature and understanding of abbreviations in paediatric medical records. RESULTS: On 25 handover sheets a total of 2286 abbreviations were used, with 221 different abbreviations; the standards recognised 14% (TID) and 20% (MMD) of these abbreviations. In 168 sets of medical notes a total of 3668 abbreviations were used, with 479 different abbreviations; the standards recognised 15% (TID) and 17% (MMD). Some words were shortened in different forms, for example, normal (N, Nl, NAD) and some abbreviations had multiple interpretations that differed from those intended, for example, TOF (tetralogy of Fallot, tracheo-oesophageal fistula). When presented with a selection of abbreviations, paediatric doctors recognized 56-94% and other healthcare professionals recognised 31-63%. CONCLUSION: Abbreviation use was widespread in paediatric note keeping. There was no systematic approach to this and difficulties in interpretation were demonstrated. The use of standardised abbreviations to avoid confusion is suggested.

Published 5 March 2008 in Arch Dis Child, 93(3): 204-6.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Pediatrics Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Pediatrics Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (November)
  Issue 2 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



Pediatrics Books

Sensational Kids: Hope and Help for Children with Sensory Processing Disorder

Sensational Kids: Hope and Help for Children with Sensory Processing Disorder